Moses Eniola is a QA Software Tester with three years of experience in quality-assuring different websites and applications manually. He has helped in finding relevant content and visual bugs, engaged in many test cases for cycles, and took part in Usability Suggestions Tasks.
He’s a year three student of the Department of Linguistics, University of Ibadan with three years of experience in translation, language annotations, and sentence generation (both in English and Yoruba).
Manual software testing guarantees that software meets the unique requirements of the client. As a result, manual software testers must create test reports and prepare and execute test cases for all of the application’s key functions.
The process of finding bugs and flaws in software through manual testing is done without the aid of software testing automation tools. QA manual testers carry out test cases manually while taking into account the viewpoint of the end user in this approach. To identify problems in the software, testers must determine whether or not there are discrepancies between the observed and anticipated outputs. The software must then be fixed by the developer, who must then retest it.
Software faults, both obvious and hidden, can be found through manual testing. Manual testing is still a crucial part of testing in software development, despite the widespread usage of automated testing. Testing is necessary for evaluating freshly built software, even though it takes a lot of work. In addition to laying the groundwork for automated testing, it ensures that the software’s fundamental functionalities are flawlessly functioning. The function of manual testing in the creation of software is covered in this article.
The primary goal of manual testing is to ensure that the software is free of errors. For this reason, manual test cases developed by QA testers must completely cover the software under test. We must employ several manual testing kinds to get 100% coverage. However, automated software testing can also include the same kinds of software testing. Manual testing, however, is still a crucial part of software testing today. Here are some reasons why manual QA testing is still crucial for software development.
1. Automation Is Not Always Accurate: Automated software testing is not always correct, which may surprise some people. Testing automation technologies, like all software, may make mistakes during testing and don’t test an application as thoroughly as is required. Multiple faults throughout the testing process can be caused by a test script that is full of mistakes. As a result, it might have a propensity to label functional features as
malfunctioning and flawed features as appropriate. To properly decide in these
circumstances, manual testing is required.
2. Additional Cycle Times (At Least Initially): Automation testing only prolongs the time it takes to deploy software initially, but it helps provide the groundwork for future test automation initiatives. Therefore, instead of completing software development rapidly, the time needed to build test cases and write automated scripts can cause delays. Your team needs manual testing in these circumstances. Setting up manual testing takes less time, and your testing team can start performing tests nearly immediately. By evaluating the test cases already included in your test cycle, manual testing assists you in achieving more test coverage as compared to writing automated scripts from the beginning.
3. Unautomatable Situations: Automated test execution is frequently impossible for software testers due to the restrictions of a given technology and platform. This may occur if the cost of automated testing is significantly higher than the cost of manual testing or if the testing scenarios are too complicated for automation. To effectively assess essential software features in such circumstances, software testers must rely on manual testing.
4. Examining the user interface: Testing responsive user interface elements can be done using automated testing systems. In terms of user interface testing as a whole, various testing techniques might have some limitations. Automated test scripts measure the separation between images, design elements, and their relative alignment with one another to evaluate the software. However, this strategy allows the tester to always create components, like alignment. Contrarily, a manual QA tester is better able to spot failed test cases.
5. A flexible approach: A flexible strategy will allow for changing software needs and incremental delivery of functional software. Software testers must update and implement the revised automated scripts in the subsequent sprint because every modification may necessitate doing so.
With that said, automated testing is a trusted method of testing software rapidly and obtaining more test coverage if you have already created a wide library of automated tests. However, up until that point, running tests that haven’t been automated manually is the only real choice.
Software testers working in an agile environment must be able to adapt to changing needs for the user interface, the product flow, and in certain circumstances, even key functionalities. Additionally, in agile organizations, these unpredictable changes may also have an impact on the regression testing scripts.
It follows that it is not surprising that even commonplace testing automation examples may end up needing different changes in agile. If the testing team is forced to entirely rewrite the pre-written test cases, the risk of changing requirements might also result in a waste of valuable resources.
This article is the sole responsibility of the author. By submitting their work to our blog, authors affirm that the content is original and does not violate any copyrights or intellectual property rights of third parties.
